| [Journal home][Issue Catalogue] |
Volume 5, Issue 2, April 1999
| Editorial | |
|
Misconduct in Science: Controversy and Progress Stephanie J. Bird and Alicia K. Dustira, 131-136. [Full Text] |
| Papers | |
|
Changing Explanatory Frameworks in the U.S. Government’s Attempt to Define Research Misconduct David H. Guston, 137-154. [Abstract] [Full Text] | |
|
Commentary on Guston’s “Changing Explanatory Frameworks in the U.S. Government’s Attempt to Define Research Misconduct” Allan C. Shipp, 155-157. [Full Text] | |
|
Commentary on Guston’s “Changing Explanatory Frameworks in the U.S. Government’s Attempt to Define Research Misconduct” Margaret L. Dale, 158-160. [Full Text] | |
|
Confronting Misconduct in Science in the 1980s and 1990s: What has and has not been accomplished? Nicholas H. Steneck, 161-176. [Abstract] [Full Text] | |
|
Commentary on Steneck’s “Confronting Misconduct in the 1980s and 1990s” Paul J. Friedman, 177-178. [Full Text] | |
|
Integrity in Science: Moving into the New Millennium (Comment on Steneck) Rosemary Chalk, 179-182. [Full Text] | |
|
The History and Future of the Office of Research Integrity: Scientific Misconduct and Beyond Chris B. Pascal, 183-198. [Abstract] [Full Text] | |
|
Scientific Misconduct: The Lessons of Time (Commentary on Pascal) Daryl E. Chubin, 199-202. [Full Text] | |
|
Commentary on Pascal’s “The History and Future of the Office of Research Integrity”, Kenneth D. Pimple, 203-204. [Full Text] | |
|
Ambiguity, Trust, and the Responsible Conduct of Research Frederick Grinnell, 205-214. [Abstract] [Full Text] | |
|
The Scientific Endeavor is Based on Vigilance, Not Trust (Commentary on Grinnell) Jonathan King, 215-217. [Full Text] | |
|
Promoting Responsible Conduct: Striving for Change Rather Than Consensus (Commentary on Grinnell) Michael J. Zigmond, 219-228. [Full Text] | |
|
The Fallout: What Happens to Whistleblowers and Those Accused But Exonerated of Scientific Misconduct? James S. Lubalin and Jennifer L. Matheson, 229-250. [Abstract] [Full Text] | |
|
Commentary on Lubalin and Matheson’s “The Fallout: What Happens to Whistleblowers...” Judith P. Swazey, 251-253. [Full Text] | |
|
Why Fallout from Whistleblowing is Hard to Avoid (Commentary on Lubalin and Matheson) Joan E. Sieber, 255-260. [Full Text] | |
|
Developing a Federal Policy on Research Misconduct Sybil Francis, 261-272. [Abstract] [Full Text] | |
|
Commentary on Francis’s “Developing a Federal Policy on Research Misconduct” Kenneth J. Ryan, 273-274. [Full Text] | |
|
“Serious Deviation from Accepted Practices” Donald E. Buzzelli, 275-282. [Full Text] | |
|
Scientific Misconduct: Present Problems and Future Trends Barbara Mishkin, 283-292. [Abstract] [Full Text] | |
|
Development of International Guidelines for Research Ethics (Commentary on Mishkin) Matthias Kaiser, 293-298. [Full Text] | |
|
Commentary on Mishkin’s “Scientific Misconduct: Present Problems and Future Trends” Debra M. Parrish, 299-301. [Full Text] |
| [Issue Catalogue] |
|
You can contact us at
opragen@opragen.co.uk Opragen Publications PO Box 54, Guildford, Surrey GU1 2YF, UK. Tel: +44 1483 560074 Fax: +44 870 2203062 |