| [Journal home][Issue Catalogue] |
| Editorial | |
|
On a Question of Trust Raymond Spier, 434-436. [Full Text] |
| Comment | |
|
The Good Engineer P. Aarne Vesilind, 437-442. [Full Text] |
| Letters | |
|
Research Misconduct: Why are Definitions So Elusive? Robert Hauptman, 443-444. [Full Text] |
| Papers | |
|
Reframing the Question of Forbidden Knowledge for Modern Science Deborah G. Johnson, 445-461. [Abstract] [Full Text] | |
|
Rhetoric, Technical Writing, and Ethics Michael Davis, 463-478. [Abstract] [Full Text] | |
|
Some Steps Towards the Recovery of Technical Writing as a Democratic Art: An Historicist Plea for Rhetoric (Commentary on Davis) Steve Fuller, 479-483. [Full Text] | |
|
Commentary on “Rhetoric, Technical Writing and Ethics” (M. Davis) Paul B. Thompson, 484-486. [Full Text] | |
|
Are Scientific Papers Examples of Rhetoric? (Commentary on Davis), Frederick Grinnell, 487-488. [Full Text] | |
|
The Ethics of Truth-Telling and the Problem of Risk Paul B. Thompson, 489-510. [Abstract] [Full Text] | |
|
Telling the Truth about Risk Assessments (Commentary on Thompson) Michael Davis, 511-513. [Full Text] | |
|
Molecular Geneticists and Moral Responsibility: “maybe if we were working on the atom bomb I would have a different argument” Barbara Nicholas, 515-530. [Abstract] [Full Text] | |
|
Why Be My Colleague’s Keeper? Moral justifications for peer review Joe Cain, 531-540. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
| Educational Forum | |
|
A Case Study: “The Concrete Sumo” -- Exigent Decision-Making in Engineering Michael Pritchard, Taft H. Broome, Jr., Vivian Weil, Joseph Herkert, Michael Davis, 541-567. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
| [Issue Catalogue] |
|
You can contact us at
opragen@opragen.co.uk Opragen Publications PO Box 54, Guildford, Surrey GU1 2YF, UK. Tel: +44 1483 560074 Fax: +44 870 2203062 |